A reasoning diagnostic for physics

See which physics idea is costing you points.

Take a 48-question multiple-choice diagnostic. Each wrong option was written to catch a specific misconception, so your report shows which ideas you keep getting wrong and links each one to a short explanation and a practice problem.

For
AP Physics students working toward F=ma and USAPhO
What's here
48 questions, 66 Atlas entries, 57 practice problems on the ladders
centre of the curvervB · outwardcircular-directionBC · forward, along vforce-accelCA · zero forcecircular-directionAD · toward the centrenet force · a = v²/rD
Fig. 1Question Q04: a car goes around a flat curve at constant speed. Each wrong answer reflects a different idea about the force. The diagnostic records which one you chose and points you to the matching explanation.

Try a question from the diagnostic.

Pick any answer, right or wrong. You'll see what that choice usually says about a student's reasoning, and where the diagnostic would send you next.

Diagnostic bench Q04 · circular motion Waiting

A car rounds a flat curve at constant speed. The direction of the net force on the car is:

Nothing is scored or saved.

Waiting for an answer.

  1. 01
    Answer —
  2. 02
    Reasoning pattern the model behind the choice
  3. 03
    Misconception code one of 12 trap families
  4. 04
    Explanation · Error Atlas the entry that explains the trap
  5. 05
    Repair · ladder rung the problem that rebuilds the idea

The full diagnostic does this for 48 questions, then ranks the misconceptions that come up most.

Start the 48-question diagnostic →

What happens to a wrong answer.

The report, the Atlas links and the practice suggestions all come from the same answer key. Here is one wrong answer traced through each step.

The correction loop: answer pattern, misconception code, diagnostic report, Error Atlas entry, recommended rung, progress data — then repeat attempts show which traps persist.
  1. 01
    Answer patternWhich choice, on which item.Q04 · chose B
  2. 02
    Misconception codeEvery wrong option is linked to a misconception.circular-direction
  3. 03
    Diagnostic reportMisconceptions that come up repeatedly rank first.ranked by recurrence
  4. 04
    Error Atlas entryWhy the wrong idea felt right, and the correct one.NL-05
  5. 05
    Recommended rungA problem that practises the missing idea.R7
  6. 06
    Progress dataA held-out follow-up checks whether the trap recurs.recurring / resolved

From the report to the next problem.

Your answers decide what you read next and which problem you try next, so your practice time goes to the ideas you actually miss.

Where the numbers come from.

65 of 19,185 reached the verified cohort, and 45 have matched pre/post pairs. The bars are drawn to scale, and each says what it can and cannot support.

Full methodology →
  1. 19,185prep users

    Broad reach. Supports reach. It does not prove learning gain.

  2. 2,102diagnostics completed

    Platform adoption. Supports product usage and diagnostic adoption.

  3. 65verified cohort

    Research sample. Supports cohort-scale analysis.

  4. 45paired pre/post

    Learning evidence. The layer used for learning-impact claims. Pre/post evidence, not a controlled trial.

Does knowing which reasoning step broke help more than doing another practice set?

Baseline diagnostic, targeted ladder work, held-out follow-up, paired comparison. We will publish the results with the sample size next to every number.